|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| |
![]() Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 I've never been a fan of the Harry Potter movies primarily because they're not really movies at all, not complete movies anyway. The films in the series thus far have amounted to merely greatest hits compilations of the fans' favourite bits from the books with barely a narrative thread to tie all the set-pieces together. The result is that if you haven't read the books, many details in the films simply make no sense at all and if you have read the books then you're forced to fill in the narrative yourself. It doesn't help, of course, that production began before the book series was completed, as the scriptwriters and directors had no idea where the story was going, making the significant inclusions in each entry a bit hit and miss in terms of the overall story arc. But regardless, it all amounts to considerable sloppy film making.
Part 2 is better than the other films because it has focus, an attribute its predecessors lack. It takes a specific part of the narrative - its core narrative - and gives it all its due attention, indulging (I'm told) in some artistic license to ensure it all works. There's no padding; there are no we-put-this-in-because-we-thought-it-would-be-cool moments; everything means something and contributes to the economy of the narrative. Unfortunately the performances from its young primary cast are as hit and miss as ever. Rupert Grint and Emma Watson have beautiful chemistry together and their passionate embrace following Hermione's triumphant destruction of a horcrux (the couple that destroys horcruxes together, stays together) is one of the films great moments. Watson and Daniel Radcliffe, however, have absolutely zero chemistry, a fact made embarrassingly apparent during that awful dance sequence in the previous film. Similarly, Radcliffe and Bonnie Wright never once look like the lovers they're meant to be - when Harry kisses Ginny, he looks like he's kissing his sister. Likewise when you see them as a married couple in the films coda, you can't help but think to yourself, "I bet they sleep in separate bedrooms". Maybe things would have been better had Ginny destroyed a horcrux? On the flip side, Helena Bonham-Carter's understated but entirely accurate portrayal of Hermione pretending to be Bellatrix Lestrange is nothing short of superb and is easily the stand-out performance of the film. Maggie Smith manages to incite the warm and fuzzies despite her miniscule screen time and Ralph Fiennes is predictably brilliant as the villain, Voldemort. It's amazing, really, what can be achieved with real actors. Oh if only the other films were this good, this could have been a very fine series. Perhaps with the benefit hindsight of all seven books, the inevitable future reboot of the franchise will produce overall better results. Until then..... Stuart Jamieson www.harrypotter.warnerbros.com |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| |
![]() Privacy Notice | Contact Us | Site Map | Copyright © 2009 modmove.com | Entertainment and Popular Culture in Review at modmove.com |
|
|||||||||||||||||||